THE REVIEW PROCEDURE
Lviv Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine as the founder and publisher of the collection of scientific papers "Efficiency of Public Administration" keeps to a certain level of requirements for acceptance and publishing of articles, is guided by recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), Ethics Code of a Scholar in Ukraine and also by the experience of foreign and Ukrainian professional societies, scientific organizations and publishing offices.
Publishing policy is based on the principles of objectivity and impartiality concerning the selection of articles with the aim of their publication, a mandatory review of articles, and compliance with the collective decision-making regarding the publication of articles, accessibility and efficiency in dealing with authors.
Ethical standards of the Editorial Board
Editorial Board is responsible for the timely publication of the collection of scientific papers "Efficiency of Public Administration".
Editor-in-Chief of the collection of scientific papers and members of the Editorial Board make a decision on the approval of articles for publication.
Editorial Board of the collection of scientific papers considers particularly unacceptable the use of plagiarism by the authors, publishing the same article in a number of editions, multiple copying of the elements of articles in different papers.
Articles, received for publication, must undergo the expert evaluation by the members of the Editorial Board. Correct presentment and scientific importance of the article are the main criteria to recommend scientific papers for publishing. Editorial Board may reject the article or return it to the author for a revision in accordance with the expressed comments.
Editorial Board has the right to reject the article without reviewing if it considers that a submitted material does not meet programme objectives (fundamental principles) and the thematic focus of the publication.
Ethical obligations of authors
Authors are solely responsible for the content of the article and fairly presented factual material.
Authors should submit to the collection of scientific papers exclusively original material, not previously published.
If an article is prepared by co-authors, it is necessary to indicate the contribution of every author to the writing of a paper. It is considered unacceptable to designate persons not involved in this research as co-authors.
When using or quoting the developments of other persons it is necessary to make references to authors and sources of borrowing. Violation of these requirements is regarded by the Editorial Board as plagiarism and is unacceptable and unethical.
Authors must submit the article to the Editorial Board prepared in accordance with established requirements for publication in the collection of scientific papers of LRIPA NAPA.
Ethical obligations of reviewers
All articles submitted for publication must be reviewed.
The purpose of the review is to evaluate the quality of a submitted article and determine its compliance with the scientific, literary and ethical standards.
Reviewing of articles by members of the Editorial Board is a mandatory step in the process of approving a paper for publishing.
Reviewers should provide the authors of the articles with objective and reasonable observations / recommendations. Personal criticism and a prejudice against authors are completely unacceptable.
Reviewers of the publication carry out the scientific expertise of papers, while maintaining complete confidentiality without transferring scientific materials to others for a review or for a discussion.
All materials, including unpublished, cannot be used by reviewers neither for personal nor other purposes without the consent of the author(s).
In a case of discrepancy of a material in the article with the qualification of a reviewer, the latter should abandon the preparation of the review.
In order to ensure the periodicity of the publication of scientific papers, reviewers are required to provide timely conclusions about articles, while faithfully performing the expertise with the respect to authors.